|
Book Reviews Archive: July 2000 to October 2002 |
by Beatrice Hanssen
The author's wide net catches a wriggling and diverse range of topics.
Motifs of wild and domestic animals in Franz Kafka writings, whether dog,
mouse, monsters like the cat-lamb or more often monstrous humans.
Benjamin's fascination with a Paul Klee painting of an angel. Concepts of
humanity, humanism and the unmensch, in opposition to Hitler's abuse of a
bastardized-Nietzchean one of the ubermensch. Benjamin's thoughts on the
kreatur and language itself.
Hanssen pays particular attention to Benjamin's first book The Origin of
German Tragic Drama, written in hopes of securing a privatdozent
university teaching position which never materialized for him. In it
Benjamin saw literary symbols that expressed an "organic, mountain and
plant-like quality" and that semantically overdetermined and oversignified
allegory proceeded from the era's interest in natural history. That this
was also the era of great wunderkammer, eclectic personal museums seems
no accident. Fragments and ruins were incorporated into theatrical drama
as they were into private scientific collections. Motifs of decay,
decomposition and dissolution prevalent in plays of that period only
mirrored nature's own.
The writings of Walter Benjamin most often studied and cited by
Multimediastes is his 1936 essay "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical
Reproduction", and Beatrice Hanssen's bases a chapter "The Aesthetics of
Transience" upon it. My own work as an artist has been marked with
volatility and disappearance-community murals quickly obliterated to
multimedia works created in popular off-the-shelf packages that can't run
in later versions (or on hardware) five years later-so found this chapter
of particular interest.
In "The Work of Art" essay Benjamin worked to develop principles that could
resist the aesthetics of fascism taking hold around him, and began with
assumptions of the validity of ideas about art from Futurism and Dadaism,
and their suitability for an age of urban temporality and fluidity.
Hanssen points out Benjamin's new aesthetic model "privileged the
fragmentary and the transient", qualities he also recognized and
appreciated in German Baroque drama. He saw the relationship of a unique
artwork to its "aura" as comparable to that of a literary allegory to its
originating phenomenon in nature.
In this arena Hanssen examines Benjamin's mutually attentive relationship
with the theories of Theodor W. Adonrno; R.B. Kitaj's 1972 painting The
Autumn of Central Paris (After Walter Benjamin) somewhat suggests visually
the richness of their discourse. After Benjamin's death Adorno carried his
pessimism about permanence on into an aesthetics of art objects never
transcendent, only transient. Hanssen writes Adorno "held that the refuse
or remnants produced by historic decay now no longer spelled 'transience'
as their meaning. Instead these relics were presented as ghostly objects,
letters, traces--that is, as a spectral scripture of a forever mediated,
inaccessible eternity." In 1998 as an apt description of much of the
ar/work displayed or constructed upon the World Wide Web.
|
copyright © 2004 ISAST