The Exiles
of Marcel Duchamp
by T. J. Demos
The MIT Press, Massachusetts Institute
of Technology, 2007
320 pp., illus. Trade, $24.95
ISBN: 0-262-04237-1.
Reviewed by Kieran Lyons
University of Wales, Newport
k.lyons@newport.ac.uk
"By escaping the determination of
architectures social regimentation,
by ultimately refusing to be in the place
of his own identity, Duchamp, of course,
had the last laugh."
So ends T. J. Demos The Exiles
of Marcel Duchamp,and in finishing
this way he underscores the familiar image
of Duchamp as the enigmatic trickster,
the mercurial personality who was always
somehow ahead of the game and yet
there are prolonged sections of this impressively
researched and argued book when Demos
seems to suggest otherwise. At such times,
a more troubled personality appears, revealing
the considerable strain of negotiating
the wars and political upheavals that
shaped his life and times. Demos
achievement is to return Duchamp to the
turbulent events that engulfed this period,
from which he periodically tried to extricate
himself but which have largely slipped
from the literature devoted to the subject.
He joined the migration of intellectuals
escaping from France, all of whom endured
the longeurs and particular disempowerment
of exile. Duchamp first crossed the Atlantic
in 1915 and this predates the main thrust
of events that form the key themes of
this narrative. By the time he arrived
back in New York in 1942, he already had
an influential group of friends in place.
Duchamps exile was, therefore, of
a different order to the other Surrealists
who found themselves in America at about
the same time. Demos does not explore
the imperatives that drove Duchamps
departure from France in 1915, and there
are even earlier instances that would
also have contributed to this narrative.
He was separated (perhaps not unhappily)
from his family as boarder while at school
and his conscription, two years before
his actual call-up, might also have been
cited when as a volunteer of 18 he served
his time in the infantry barracks at Eu.
Perhaps the condition of exile is seen
most clearly in his abrupt decision to
leave Paris in 1912 in order to work away
from his associates for five months of
unrecorded isolation in Munich in 1912.
Demos structures the material in his book
into four separate chapters separate
essays almost that are situated,
first of all in 1940, with Duchamp creating
his Boite en Valise Box in
a Valise (1941). He then winds back
to 1918 with Duchamp in Buenos Aires,
obviously pleased with his Sculpture
de Voyage Sculpture for Travelling
that he brought with him. From here the
narrative accelerates forward to Paris
in 1938 and his curatorial role for the
Exposition International du Surréalisme
and finally to New York in 1942, where
as the eponymous exile he disrupts, again,
the opening of the First Papers
of Surrealism exhibition
and what mugs those surrealists were to
allow him to steal their thunder a second
time. It would be difficult to imagine
such docile acceptance by fellow artists
today. By all accounts the surrealists
were just as self-regarding and prone
to direct action, just as capable of tearing
down coal-sacks and unravelling string
as their 21st century counterparts would
be today. In doing so, the aggrieved Surrealists
would have performed a gesture to compete
favourably with Duchamps laborious
interventions in the first instance
they would have had the last laugh. The
material and insight that Demos brings
to this particular subject is informative,
and convincing, but at times his discussion
is predicated on established lines of
critical theory, limiting a simpler approach
that might have added to his exegesis.
This is where, for this reviewer, the
books chief problem lies. For all
Demos convincing analysis in the
final two chapters the complex interpretation
he develops is predicated on the face
value of photographs. These images are
of course taken from the surviving archive,
but there is insufficient attention given
to the fact that the evidence they bring
is really only a fractional moment in
the extended chain of events that make
up an exhibition. This quite possibly
saw (I would say probably saw,) the apotheosis
of tearing down and unravelling mooted
above. Lewis Kachurs 2001 Displaying
the Marvelous provides a more extensive
inventory of the separate works in the
exhibition and yet the additional photographs
he includes show the audience in a manner
that is stilted and posed, suggesting
that the rather sparse public were there
to obey the photographers instructions.
It would be interesting to know what happened
to these installations after the publicity
photographs were taken.
It might be argued that to do this would
have deflected from the principal theme
of the book stated in the title The
Exiles of Marcel Duchamp. Although
the work is nominally, and principally,
devoted to aspects of the life and career
of Duchamp within this Surrealist period,
Demos nevertheless extends his theme to
the Surrealists themselves, and how exile
became a defining condition of the surrealist
dilemma in the 1940s. Few of these
artists had any experience of the displacement
that would follow although ironically,
collage, Surrealisms lasting legacy
to the methodology of practice, is predicated
on the awkward and disconcerting juxtapositions
of displacement. Demos analysis
of Surrealisms melancholy transformation
from a movement bent on integration through
a dynamic relationship with the city (hence
the Surrealist Street of the
1938 exhibition) to a sadly displaced
group of misfits, badly adapted to their
new conditions, who retreated to the salon
as a last bastion of artistic survival
is particularly good and illuminating.
The majority of Surrealist exiles to America
had never been there before the 1940s,
but Duchamp had been shuttling backwards
and forwards across the Atlantic (five
times between 1919 and 1924,) before taking
up residence in Paris, only to leave for
Casablanca and then New York after Germany
invaded France in 1940. He eventually
took up American nationality in the 1950s
and in this stable period the conditions
and concerns of exile must have fallen
away. This is why, surely, Demos restricts
his discussion and ignores the final productive
quarter of Duchamps life when he
was secretly revisiting earlier ideas
in Étant Donné, between
1946 and 1968. The exhausted architecture
of this installation seems to bear witness
to the decline of Surrealism.
The conditioning influence of exile is
made most clearly in chapter two when
Duchamp, in order to escape impressment
into the American army took ship to Buenos
Aires, taking with him also his portable,
pocket-sized installation of rubber bathing
caps that could be effortlessly expanded
to stretch and configure into a multiplicity
of spaces; how economical this work is
in comparison to the coal sacks that he
would laboriously install in Paris twenty
years later. In the 1918 work Duchamp
fuses the practical conditions of being
a nomad within the metonym of displacement.
This successful elision does not happen
so easily with the other projects discussed
in The Exiles of Marcel Duchamp.
La Boîte en Valise, for instance
in chapter one, serves as an elegant metaphor
of the condition of exile but is also
freighted with so many other attributes
of memory, fragility, multiplicity, commerce,
legacy and reputation that the metaphor
becomes subsumed within these. The later
Surrealist exhibition installations are
too dependent on the specifics of architecture
and institutional forms and as I suggest,
too dependant on the questionable evidence
of documentary photographs. Nevertheless,
from the vantage of 1918, we can look
forward to the conceptual links and the
formal similarities that occurred later
on. Demos has succeeded in foregrounding
this somewhat under-considered work, but
it is really his discussion of how Sculpture
de Voyage and its derivatives demonstrate
in Demos own words a dedication
to mobility [that] is particularly meaningful
at this historical moment when identity
was entering into regimentation in the
face of world war. On arriving in
Argentina, Duchamp commented in a letter,
that it was a bit like arriving as a German
prisoner of war because of the similarity
between Argentine and German uniforms.
It is this sense of being shadowed by
European and American militarism and the
artistic forms that followed that runs
as a leitmotif through this book that
makes it such a productive and rewarding
read.
The books format is small compared
to most of the other M.I.T books on my
shelf, and this gives it the feel of an
initial primer. This is deceptive, although
Demos prose style is always easy
to read the material he deploys assumes
that the reader has previously assimilated
the fundamentals of Duchamps career
and gone, in fact, some way beyond this
point. The Exiles of Marcel Duchamp
should be consulted as a follow-up to
other more generic introductions to the
artist, but should also remain as a stable
point in the exponential growth of books
that his legacy generates.