Arnheim,
Gestalt and Art: A Psychological Theory
by Ian Verstegen
Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2005
188pp., illus. 18 b/w. Paper, $ 49.95
ISBN: 3-211-28864-3.
Reviewed by Amy Ione
The Diatrope Institute
ione@diatrope.com
In his foreword to New Essays on the
Psychology of Art (1986), Rudolf Arnheim
writes: "My papers tend to look like mavericks
in the company in which they first appear
and reveal their raison dêtre
only when they are allowed to come home
and complement one another." Reading this
statement several years ago I thought
how apt it was. His name invariably comes
up in discussions of art and perception.
Yet, I believe, he remains an enigma,
a powerful thinker who seems to defy classification.
Part of the puzzle in locating his niche,
perhaps, is that his original and perceptive
approach is not easily placed within typical
categories. Another component, no doubt,
is that until recently there have been
no book-length studies of his work.
Ian Verstegens recently published
Arnheim, Gestalt and Art: A Psychological
Theory remedies this lacuna. Verstegen,
who clearly admires Rudolf Arnheim, carefully
explains this thinkers core ideas
and his influences. The books main
theme is that Arnheims analysis
of art serves a fundamental need in studies
of the psychology of art. Verstegens
expansive critique demonstrates how. Overall,
the book offers a piercing critical examination
of inter-related themes in Arnheims
work and examines where his major ideas
intersect with the writings of major figures
that have written on similar topics. Structurally
the book is divided into three parts:
foundational principles, such principles
applied to the various arts, and the developmental
aspect of art. It also communicates that
Arnheim distinguished three levels in
the perception of affects. First, he identifies
a crucial cognitive state of the identification
of objects. This could correspond to the
affect as it is experienced. Then, there
is the expressive and motivational component.
These are identical and could correspond
to the perceptual expression that is available
to other perceivers. Thirdly, there is
the emotional expression, the level of
tension that is perceived by the person.
Within this framework, Verstegen proposes
that Arnheims use of the Gestalt
approach offers a worthwhile option, providing
a unified approach to perception. Areas
considered include the various sense modalities
and media, how dynamic processes unfold
in time, and how these processes imbued
Arnheims views of creativity and
development.
Buttressing his argument are the far-reaching
summaries that contrast Arnheims
thought with that of others. These range
from Arnheims rejection of the naïve
epistemological idea of unconscious drives
working blindly, the Freudian legacy to
his disappointments with Gibsons
failure to adequately incorporate art
into his visual theories. Verstegen also
compares the cognitive nativism (associated
with JJ Gibson) with the cognitive inferentialism
(associated with Helmholtz). In short,
Arnheim recognized the Gibsonian view
left little space for imagination and
has a difficult time discussing anything
other than representational art, a point
often made by others as well. The Inferentialists,
on the other hand, depend so much on "inference"
that the vast terrain covered by their
theories fails to adequately grapple with
the problems of perceptual organization
in a way that meaningfully integrates
the dynamics aspect of the art experience
and the creation of art. Also mentioned
are topics such as the recent revival
of Gestalt psychology (in the work of
people like Steven Lehar), how Arnheim
intersects with researchers commonly associated
with vision and cognitive science (e.g.,
Zeki, Solso, Shepard, Kosslyn, etc.),
where he dissents from Gombrich and Wollheim,
how Gestalt psychology compares with information
processing, and how his views align with
those of Werner, Piaget, and various art
educators.
Development is an important aspect of
Arnheims work, so I was pleased
to see that the sections of the book devoted
to Arnheims developmental studies
are solid and substantive. They convey
that many of his ideas (e.g., dynamics
of visual action or
pantomimic form) have their roots
in Arnheims classic Film as Art
(1932), first published when he was only
28 years old, which occupies a unique
place in terms of formal theories of visual
perception. Sections on Arnheims
view of creativity are similarly compelling.
These include some discussion of how Arnheim
used a study of Picassos Guernica
to comment on fully-functioning creativity
in an individual in terms of concrete
projects. General reference is also made
to individual artistic development in
terms of childhood, adulthood, and old
age. These sections convey Arnheims
view that creativity includes a dialectic
between individual growth and maturation.
Throughout it is clear that Arnheim sees
art as a major way of knowing the world.
He neither elevates the internal world
nor neglects the external environment.
Equally impressive is Verstegens
analysis of two competing aspects of Arnheims
thinking on the intelligence of the senses.
As he writes:
"There are two competing
aspects of Arnheims thinking on
the intelligence of the senses
. . . There is, on the one hand, the ability
of the senses to contain universal or
abstract information. And there is, on
the other hand, the manipulation of images
for productive thinking. We might relate
the two by saying that individual percepts
already contain abstract content, just
as a work of art can be called the abstracted
solution to an artistic problem. It is,
however, the manipulation of symbols within
the work of art that represents the problem-solving
aspect of creation and the means to the
solution of the final work. " (p. 22)
That Arnheim, Gestalt
and Art is as much a general appraisal
of Gestalt psychology as a critique of
Arnheim is particularly evident in the
chapter on music. Verstegen claims Arnheims
deep and passionate interest in music
influenced his thinking overall although
he did not publish extensively in this
area. The author thus offers constructed
musical theories to place Arnheims
work in the context of Gestalt psychology
by drawing upon Victor Zuckerkandls
perceptual approach. Although I found
the musical theories fascinating and acknowledge
Arnheims early involvement with
some of the scholars who looked at connections
between music and Gestalt psychology indicates
his deep feeling for all aspects of music,
Verstegens analyses seemed too much
of stretch in a survey of Arnheims
theoretical work. My sense that we lessen
this thinkers contributions when
we extend them too far was confirmed with
the chapter on poetry and poetic. This
section totally failed to gel. In addition,
there is surprisingly little discussion
of the brain, although various cognitive
scientists and topics such as neurosis
are mentioned. While it was not a major
part of Arnheims work, given that
his ideas largely matured before research
of the brain advanced at the end of the
twentieth century, I would have liked
Verstegen to include more specific reference
to the where Arnheim fits today. I also
wished he had included an index and hope
one will be added if the book is re-printed.
Upon finishing the book, I was once again
reminded of how impressed I am each time
I encounter Arnheims work, particularly
his insights into visual thinking and
visual perception. I believe that this
is his greatest contribution, particularly
his sensitivity to each persons
"visual history" and his acknowledgement
that we are also influenced by our cultural
histories. I wish the book had placed
his ideas in this area in terms of art
historical analyses since Arnheims
scope extends well beyond Gestalt Theory
per se. I would propose that it is his
reach that significantly elevates his
writings and, by extension, explains some
of the puzzle of Arnheim. On the other
hand, I was glad that Verstegen effectively
introduced Arnheims elevation of
unity, balance, and centeredness and firmly
placed these aspects of his work in relation
to dynamics and development.
Finally, and unexpectedly, as I write
the review, I find myself thinking about
Arnheims contributions in light
of his own story. Born in 1904, Arnheim
has now lived over one hundred years.
He is one of the many Jewish thinkers
who left Nazi Germany just as Hitler was
implementing his program. Thus it is hard
not to reflect on the wide sweep of this
thinkers experience and how his
life compares with others who were forced
to leave their homeland at that time.
(e.g. E.H. Gombrich, Walter Benjamin,
and major thinkers of the entire Gestalt
School). Running the ideas of each figure
through my mind and thinking about how
dramatically our global community has
changed over the last 100 years left me
thinking how fascinating it would be to
talk to Arnheim directly about his life,
how his ideas formed over time, and all
of the ideas covered in Arnheim, Gestalt
and Art: A Psychological Theory. This
is unlikely to happen, so I am glad to
have the opportunity to indirectly have
this conversation through Verstegens
excellent book. I am equally delighted
that Rudolf Arnheim has lived to see this
well-done study of his work published.
It is a grand addition to the psychology
of art literature. In summary, this book
makes it clear that Rudolf Arnheim is
an important thinker.
Reference:
Arnheim, Rudolf. 1986. New Essays on
the Psychology of Art, Berkeley and
Los Angeles, California: University of
California Press, p. ix.