Leonardo Digital Reviews
 LDR Home  Index/Search  Leonardo On-Line  About Leonardo  Whats New








LDR Category List

Books

CDs

Events/Exhibits

Film/Video

Vermeer's Camera: Uncovering the Truth behind the Masterpieces

by Philip Steadman.
Oxford University Press: Oxford and New York, 2001.
207 pp., illus. color + b/w, $25.00.
ISBN:: 0-19-215967-4
Reviewed by Wilfred Niels Arnold. Professor of Biochemistry, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160-7421 U.S.A. E-mail: warnold@kumc.edu


Modern artists have incorporated mechanically-derived images into their pictures. Robert Rauschenberg (1925- ) and Andy Warhol (1928-1987) spring to mind for their applications of photographically-generated silk-screens, with or without color manipulations and hand-painted areas. David Hockney (1937- ) has used photographs as the starting point for many of his paintings. It's worth mentioning that none of them started his career that way nor enjoys the universal admiration of a Rembrandt van Rijn (1606-1669) or a Vincent van Gogh (1853-1890). But their successes are sufficient to conclude that a sizable segment of contemporary viewers will accept almost any device as a means to an artistic end.

Accordingly, a measure of paradox attends the recent depth of scrutiny of Johannes Vermeer (1632-1675) and his supposed utilization of an optical machine, the camera obscura. The essence of this bright idea (or distasteful notion, depending on your stance) is that Vermeer set up a lens system at the position that would become his painting's "viewpoint" and projected an image of the scene into a black box and thence to a sheet of tracing paper, or even directly onto his painting surface. A number of his exquisite little paintings suggest the same room with recurring architectural features in the patterns of leaded panes in the windows, of tiles on the floor, and of ceiling joists. Could the actual room be part of Vermeer's home? Did the artist set up a curtained work area against the far wall, behind the viewpoint? The site of the house is known, but it was demolished in the 19th century. Even the suggestion that an old master should resort to such an approach is regarded by some patrons as unthinkable. One art historian was overheard to mutter the non sequitur "... if Vermeer had used such a device, then he certainly would have written about it." Again, no documentary evidence survives about Vermeer's working methods.

Is the use of the camera obscura a form of artistic cheating? The answer that comes out of this elegant book is a resounding "no." Based upon twenty years of fascination with the Dutch artist , Philip Steadman provides a well reasoned argument that Vermeer explored and developed a new way of looking and yet, in little but significant ways, embellished or modified his final paintings to his own artistic preference. All of these ideas are documented and illustrated. The admirable approach of Steadman, the thing that sets him apart from so many others in this field, is that he does experiments and interprets the findings as either supporting of damaging his working hypotheses. By exploiting the great precision of Vermeer he was able to reconstruct the architecture of the subject room and to measure absolute sizes from extant museum pieces of furniture, maps, and other pictures that the artist incorporated into his domestic scenes. The geometric evaluations suggest that Vermeer worked optically rather than through the painstaking mathematical methods of perspective. However, I was left wondering about the intensity and contrast of the projected image inside a camera obscura cabinet. I have never been inside one, more's the pity, but I can't imagine it being much fun for an extended period. Some structured experiences by contemporary artists under similar circumstances might be instructive.

"Vermeer's Camera" is written in a clear style with an enthusiasm that sweeps the reader towards the author's conclusions. As becomes a scholarly work, Steadman also analyzes the evidence against the camera obscura and dismisses most of it in balanced fashion. The coverage of published works in related areas is adequate. The quality of the paper, printing, and the reproductions of artistic works is consistently high. One production criticism concerns the ten color plates which appear without page or plate numbers, ganged together between pages 114 and 115 of the text, and thus take on the curiosity of a "late addition." The index is accurate but skimpy. For example, if you look up "tiles" or "floor tiles" you will not find them under "T" or "F" but rather as a subheading under "Vermeer's paintings." There is no excuse for this and one always hopes for a friendly and intentionally redundant index. But overall this is a very attractive book , full of useful information and intelligent argument. The nicely appointed and well attended Vermeer exhibitions in the U.S.A. and Europe during the last decade make this publication timely and recommend it to a wide audience.

Philip Steadman is Professor of Urban and Built Form Studies, University College London. He has taught at Cambridge University and the Open University, in departments with other engaging titles such as Urban Morphology. He has authored or edited several volumes in a field that strikes me as "living geometry."

top







Updated 5 June 2001.




Contact LDR: ldr@leonardo.org

Contact Leonardo: isast@leonardo.info


copyright © 2001 ISAST