YLEM Journal:
Artists Using Science and Technology
by Loren Means, Editor
YLEM, San Francisco, USA, May-August 2006
27 pp., illus. b/w. NP
SSN: 1057-2031
Journal website:
http://www.ylem.org.
Reviewed by Rob Harle
Australia
harle@dodo.com.au
YLEM (pronounced eye-lem) is Greek
for "the exploding mass from which the
universe emerged". It is the name of the
journal presently being reviewed and also
of the "international organization of
artists, scientists, authors, curators,
educators and art enthusiasts who explore
the intersection of the arts and sciences".
Their web site is www.ylem.org
if youre interested in art
and science, it is a must to visit.
This is a double issue concerned specifically
with the Singularity. Other than the final
article, which is an excerpt of a talk
given by Martha Senger, and Hofstadters
cartoon presentation, all other articles
are in the form of interviews. The "Big
Thinkers" (as YLEM refers to them)
featured in this issue are Suzi Gablik,
Douglas Hofstadter, Ray Kurzweil, Jaron
Lanier, and John Searle. The selection
of these representative "thinkers" is
important as it gives a balanced approach
to this most intriguing hypothesis
the Singularity.
Kurzweil describes the Singularity as
a metaphor and states, "The real meaning
of "singularity" is similar to the concept
of the "event horizon" in physics" (p.
12)that is, its a
technological event horizon that we
cant see past. It is a hypothetical
concept that refers to the point when
technology reaches a critical mass and
moves forward, away from biological humans,
on its own, under its own intentionality
and volition.
There is very little art in this issue,
and one would be excused for thinking
it is a futuristic philosophy journal.
I was very disappointed with the graphic
quality. It is printed on cheap, plain
paper and the black & white photographic
reproductions are atrocious. They remind
me of the low standard available from
photocopiers in the early 80s. I would
have thought that at a membership subscription
cost of $40USD, and given the ubiquity
of low cost desktop scanners and printers,
a higher quality production would be in
order. Also there appears to be no subscription
available for non-American residents?
Gablik and Laniers contributions
give a cautious and concerned environmental
and humanistic counterbalance to Kurzweils
infectious push towards a nonbiological
future for humans, where technology
reins supreme and we move off the earth
and out to colonise the universe. Searle
gives strong philosophical arguments against
even the possibility of true artificial
intelligence. Kurzweils hopes will
never be realised if we dont fix
up this planet urgently. The destruction
of the natural environment, increasing
at an exponential rate (to borrow his
favourite phrase) and the major climatic
changes associated with this may see no
humans left here from which to transcend
in technological rapture. Hofstadters
brilliantly conceived cartoons take a
shot at both sides of the singularity
camp and in a sense highlight just how
ignorant we are.
Sengers talk is the only one that
discusses art, and it has some very interesting
and inspiring concepts, the title is
Neo-Vorticism: The Tao of Form.
It is unfortunate that the talk contains
so much California-speak, New Age jargon
that it is almost painful to read. More
seriously though, it contains some amazing
generalizations and unsubstantiated speculations.
For example, he writes, "Were in
the midst of a momentous cultural shift
perhaps equal to that of the emergence
of consciousness several thousand
years ago" [my emphasis] (p. 23). We have
no real clue as to when and how "consciousness
emerged"; it was certainly not "several
thousand years ago". Even more ridiculous
is the following statement that I will
quote in full: "This situates us within
the domain of the strange attractor
living time free within a
toroidal topology of uncertainty but with
a clear view to the future
alert to its symbolic nuances, surfing
its self-similar curves and tuned to the
golden-mean ratio of that aesthetic object
of desire at this epochs end
the Singularity" (p. 23).
"Aesthetic object of desire!" If there
is one thing that all proponents of the
Singularity agree upon, it is that it
is unknowable from this side. It is a
sure sign of foolishness to make something
that is unknowable and inconceivable into
an aesthetic object of desire. Particularly
when there is a very real possibility
that if the Singularity does occur, it
may be the most inhuman, disastrous
event ever brought about by "smart but
not wise" humans. The great thing about
YLEM is that it brings these contentious,
potentially dangerous concepts into the
public arena for balanced debate.