Edward
Said: The Last Interview
by Mike Dibb
First Run/Icarus Films, Brooklyn, New
York, 2004
114 minutes, col.
Distributors website: http//:www.frif.com.
Reviewed by Andrea Dahlberg
dahlberg@bakernet.com
Less than a year before his death on 25
September 2003 Edward Said gave this,
his final interview, over the course of
three days. Said speaks of his illness
and how he was virtually unable to read,
write, and listen to music. But there
is no sign in this remarkable film of
any abatement of his immense intellectual
energy or passionate engagement with life.
Said speaks for almost two hours about
his life, his major works including Orientalism
and Culture and Imperialism, his
films, his role as a member of the Palestine
National Council and his subsequent profound
disillusionment with Arafat and the Oslo
Accords. It is hard to think of another
individual who could carry an entire film
of this length merely by speaking to an
appropriately low-key interviewer like
Charles Glass.
With a face that could have been painted
by el Greco, Said is blazingly articulate.
He illustrates his points with references
to Vico, Foucault, Jane Austen, Gerard
Manley Hopkins, Conrad, Graham Greene,
Daumier, Tagore, Faulkner, Shakespeare,
Hemingway, Mailer, Eliot, Roth, Chomsky
and Napoleon. He describes his obsession
with counterpoint and his preference for
Rossellini over Verdi (Verdi is always
"in italics"). Said also discusses American
self-identity, the US educational system,
and the provincial nature of its intellectuals,
like Roth and Mailer who remain focused
on the interior life of the country and
do not engage with its immense impact
in the world. Yet he is always accessible
and engaging. Whether describing his schooling
in Cairo and the US, his views of his
parents, his existential experiences of
exile or his intellectual and political
passions, Said makes sparks fly and paints
a vast, vivid world that he inhabits more
intensely than most. Said's emotional
and imaginative range is as great as his
intellect. I have had the pleasure of
watching this film with people who are
well versed in Said's work and others
who had barely heard of him. Not one of
them failed to be drawn in, energised,
and left wanting to respond to Said's
ideas.
The director of this film, Mike Dibb,
was a friend of Said's who knew his subject
sufficiently well to make the roles of
the interviewer and the camera as unobtrusive
as possible. Said wears the same clothes
over the three day period when the film
was shot, which helps create the illusion
that the viewer is the third party in
a small room listening to Said and, to
a lesser extent, Glass conversing. The
result is an intimate portrait of a great
mind.
With the passing of Edward Said the world
has lost a great intellectual and an articulate
and credible spokesman for Palestine.
This film has captured the man himself.