Platform
for Art
by Alex Cole, with Introduction by
Tasmin Dillon
Black Dog Publishing Ltd., London,
UK, 2007
160 pp., 173 illus. Paper, UK 19.95
pounds, US $29.95
ISBN: 978 1 906155 06 3.
Reviewed by Michael R. (Mike) Mosher
Saginaw Valley State University
mosher@svsu.edu
Three and a half million journeys are taken each day on the London Underground,
or Tube, and that number is expected to grow to four million by 2020. Though the stations were built as much
as a hundred (and as few as ten), years ago, the first public art project
was exhibited in it in 2000—a century and a half after the first trains
on the system rolled out of one station and into another. This is a fine well-illustrated catalogue
of the artwork on the Tube, assembled by the head of the art exhibition project.
Several works have a sensibility akin to the comics, including Zho Bano’s
“Uh-oh! Pandaman,” where the artist photographed himself with a
superimposed word balloon and cuddly toy bear to allude to China’s one-child
policy. That species of bear also appears in Brian Griffith’s site-specific “Life
is a Laugh”, where a giant concrete panda head and miscellaneous bric-a-brac
are a piled upon the platform to suggest a construction site. Comic books seem to have inspired works
by Lars Arrhenius, Shizad Dawood and Asia Aiffasi, and Janette Paris’ “Going
South” cartoons an imaginary rock band. Cartoon
style also informed the interface graphics of the digital
“Platform for Art Online”. And
Chiho Aoshima would not be insulted for us to appreciate the anime or J-Pop
delicacy of “City Glow, Mountain Whisper” 2006 within the round,
arched niches in Gloucester Road station.
Niches in an underground stations was the site of David Batchelor’s “Ten
Silhouettes”, axially symmetric and made of found, discarded steel,
illuminated by colored lights. Lothar
Götz’s 2006 work made use of rhythmic colored triangles, while
Richard Woods created multicolored mock-planks to surround a ticket booth. Jim Isermann wrapped a train on the Picadilly Line in red
and blue trompe l’oeil recessed squares, and Beatriz Milhazes’ 2005 “Peace
and Love” gave the Tube riders a view of colored circles and baroque
swirls evocative of her native Brazil. Paul
Caherall’s “London Linos”, striking linoleum-block prints
exhibited in 2002, sport a mid-century Moderne simplicity.
Other projects were photography-based, beginning with 2002 work by Cindy
Sherman, 10 portraits of women . . . which, of course, were all pictures
of Cindy in various costumes. Rose
Butler worked with the London Underground staff for the mysterious “Platform
Portraits”, black and white photographs, sometimes provocatively cropped.
Braco Dimitrijevic created posters of passers-by that he photographed Samuel Fosso exhibited three big
“Autoportraits,” and Eileen Perrier’s “Grace” series
of 2002 were similarly-posed portraits of a multiethnic variety of gap-toothed individuals. In 2006 Suki Dhanda shot
”Year of the Dog” portraits of boys and families living near the
station with their pets, while Paulo Piri’s “To Me” mysteriously
depicted zebras atop snowy mountains. Rut
Blees Luxemberg’s
“Picadilly Pecadilloes” of 2007 showed local signs reflected in
puddles, a momentary something that one might notice while leaving the station
on a rainy evening.
There were some community-based projects, that grew out of the neighborhoods
around the Tube stations. The
program exhibited work by graduating Royal Academy students, posters by high
schoolers, an installation by a women’s knitting society, works of
fashion photography graduates, and young Chinese artists and museum-going
schoolchildren who viewed Chinese artifacts and then painted them. Ella Gibbs and Amy Platt 2006 “A
Station Musical for Stratford” involved kids from Carpenters Primary
School, while other projects were enlivened by the involvement of footballers
and young offenders. Orello De’Souza Harley and Courtia
Newland’s piece “Connected” concerned the West Indians
brought to London after WWII to work in various capacities for London Transport. As the meaning of so much changed since
9/11 and the War on Terrorism, the most political work was Beth Derbyshire’s
“Careless Talk Costs Lives”, making use of warnings from the second
world war. Perhaps the Brazilian
tourist, who was shot by nervous police who assumed he was an Arab terrorist,
was gazing at this work?
A work dependent on type was Mark Titchen’s “I WE IT” in
2004, which had statements that began “We want...” with the look
of trade union banners, ornamented with fists and garlands, supposedly inspired
by both William Morris and the artist’s favorite 13th Floor Elevators
album covers. Other works making use of text were Simon
Bedell’s 2004 “Advertising Never Tells Anyone Anything Anyway”,
and the bibliographic citations exhibited by Emma Rushton and Derek Tyman. Artists were also employed to create
graphics for oyster card wallets, and covers to the Tube map. David Shrigley
tangled colored lines are a good metaphor, for that’s what the transport
system must appear as to a confused and frustrated traveler. Cornelia Parker put rorshach blots on the Tube map cover,
and other artists used other strategies. In
non-static media, Steven Willats’ film made and exhibited in 2007 in
Ryners Lane and Sudbury Town stations, and Guy Bar Amotz produced a series
of live musical performances, broadcast through speakers sculpted into statues
of dead musicians.
Meanwhile, the visual culture of the Tube is reinforced with this book’s
use of the handsome Gill Sans typeface, for Eric Gill was taught by Edward
Johnston, who designed the typeface for the London Underground. The book carries an Introduction by Tim O’Toole of its
Advisory Committee, who thanks the Arts Council and Arts in Business, and
an essay by Alex Coles follows. If
there is a limitation to this book, it is that its tone is invariably positive;
this same limitation colors Jane Golden’s books from Temple University
Press on the Philadelphia Murals program, which she runs. While we are fortunate to be given an insider’s view,
it is also inevitably a self-serving volume of successes, with a positive
spin. The reviewer has been involved in enough
community art projects to know that sometimes things go wrong, despite the
best of intentions. Which projects
were commissioned that screwed up? Which ones do the Tube commuters dislike? Producer Maverick
Litchfield-Kelly, of London’s Neath Films, recently told this reviewer
that he recalled censorship of at least one of the poems that were displayed
in the Tube, considered too vital and inflammatory. One would like to read in this book of any controversy, of
local opposition that was finally won over or that agreed to live peacefully
with the project in its neighborhood station.
Maybe there wasn’t any, and the artists (excepting that rude poet)
were all spectacularly chosen for their sympathy and understanding of the
place where their art projects would appear. Perhaps
the diverse buffet of artworks were either rooted in the surrounding communities,
or appreciated as exciting addition to its daily life...or simply ignored
by the majority of busy commuters in transit.