One does not need a crystal ball to see that the current laissez-faire capitalist economic model is no longer globally sustainable. Recent global financial disasters and difficulties indicate that a new sustainable model is urgently required. OA and OS are part of that new model and the rapid expansion and acceptance of these movements and associated practical outcomes is an encouraging sign. Very few would expect a company not to make a profit but it is the size of the profit that is the contentious issue. It is difficult to justify the outrageous cost of commercial Office Software Suites when OS applications, such as Open Office, are totally free, equally as good and completely compatible!
If you doubt the relevance of this obscene profit making to academic publishing, Suber presents the sobering fact that the largest journal publisher earned higher profits than the world's largest oil company, “In 2010, Elsevier's journal division had a profit margin of 35.7 percent while ExxonMobil had only 28.1 percent.” (p. 32)
If this extreme profiteering is not distasteful enough and damaging for libraries and public knowledge, it is even more so because all authors provide their research papers at no charge to the publisher and generally relinquish copyright as well! My partner is constantly lamenting the fact that I get no payment for my peer-review editorial work nor for my own published academic papers. As Suber notes this is the way of the academy and has been so for close on 350 years. Academics write for impact and the advancement of public knowledge, not money.
Open Access as Suber explains throughout this book is really a win-win situation when analysed carefully and without being motivated by the agenda of greed driving publishing companies. This greed is holding back knowledge, reducing access by the smaller institutions to research findings and reducing journal subscription rates dramatically. Even Harvard and other top universities have had to clip their library budgets in recent years. With the Internet and electronic access one would expect the reverse to be true.
The quote below was included in an email I recently received from the International Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences for a CFP. It illustrates Suber's thesis perfectly and indicates that the “writing is on the wall” so to speak for academic publishers who refuse to accommodate OA in their business plans.
“IJMMS is an Open Access Journal. One key request of researchers across the world is unrestricted access to research publications. Open access gives a worldwide audience larger than that of any subscription-based journal and thus increases the visibility and impact of published works. It also enhances indexing, retrieval power and eliminates the need for permissions to reproduce and distribute content. IJMMS is fully committed to the Open Access Initiative and will provide free access to all articles as soon as they are published”
It is interesting to consider that virtually everyone in society is hurt by unnecessary fiscal restriction to research papers and data. Advances in medicine may be held back because of lack of access, this affects those waiting for a cure for a disease as well as frustrating the researchers trying to find the cure. It is not only urgent high level research that suffers. So called, developing nations, have appallingly limited access to academic journals (and the Internet). A paper I recently peer-reviewed showed they have just as important and urgent cultural concerns as we do, in this case the destruction of their traditional buildings.
By insisting on (at minimum) green OA for your research papers and other published work the OA movement will gain more momentum and result in a better and more equitable world.