Leonardo Author Questionnaire Responses
(29 total)
Question 1
Are you a subscriber to Leonardo?
Yes: 9
No: 20
If yes, how long?
1 year or less: 1
2 years: 1
3 years:
4 years:
5 years: 1
6 years: 1
7 years:
8 years: 1
9 years: 1
10 years:
10+ years: 1
If not, why not a subscriber?
Financial reasons: 6
Library subscribes: 14
Other: 2
Question 2
Please rate the following statements:
[average from 1 (disagree) to 5 (agree)]
It took too long for my article to be
published. 2.4
I would prefer less text and more
illustrations. 2.3
Leonardo is too expensive for
individuals. 3.1
Leonardo covers too many subjects. 1.6
In general, the writing is too
academic and formal. 1.8
Leonardo should provide more
editorial assistance. 1.9
The visual appearance of Leonardo
could be improved. 2.3
I would prefer more technical
information. 2.6
Question 3
Which sections do you read most often in
Leonardo? [average from 1 (always) to 3 (never)]
Editorial 1.6
Articles by Artists 1.5
Sound, Music, Science and Technology 1.5
General Articles 1.6
Technical Articles 1.8
ISAST Bulletin: International
Opportunities 1.7
Historical Perspectives 1.6
Theoretical Perspectives 1.6
Book ReviewsCurrent Literature 1.7
Commentaries 1.9
Art/Science Forum 1.7
Do you have suggestions for new sections in
the journal?
Question 4
What new topics should Leonardo address?
"All topics that are new, even
if they havent yet been seen as potentially used by
artist: cognition for example. Excellent to
work also on A-Life."
"Forcasting (scientific) art
development; Empirical aesthetics"
"New Digital Graphic Technology; New
Media Arts; Virtual Reality"
"More on virtual reality"
"Cross-cultural analysis of color
categorization; the interest in science stemming
from issues such as human genome, genetically
modified food"
"viractuality"
"industrial/technological processes and
materials that have potential for artistic
use."
"more philosophical topics"
Question 5
What topic areas do you feel Leonardo should
not get into? Or should get out of?
"synesthesia; virtual Africa;
Brazilian anything"
"I am not interested in very
technical articles."
"Totally commercial areas.
Leonardo is an academic journal with an open
perspective."
"Explicitly commercial; Anything too
mainstream"
"Digital Graphics are now in the
mainstream and should be left to more
conventional arts publications."
Question 8
Do you have a mailing list that we could use
to promote Leonardo?
Yes responses: 4
Question 9
Please add any other comments on how we can
improve Leonardo.
"more color illustrations"
"more images on the on-line
version"
"I think the topics and the
direction in Leonardo are clear. Perhaps it may include
a section in which artists unformaly discuss
some current issues. Non-English
speakers or the artist who have less
experience may freely participate in order to
discuss the current tendency, as well. I also
think the editor who patiently helped
my article."
"to retain an emphasis on developments
in the arts, sciences and technology in
countries throughout the world."
"As a contributor, I do not particularly
like your reference style, which blends
sources with notes. I much prefer the
"scientific" style, where books, articles, etc.
are listed under "references" and
cited in the body of the text between brackets.
Eg: such a realm is art
(Heidegger 1954:55). Although I must admit that I have
got a considerable amount of feedback from
editors, I also think, regarding this
point, that the more, the
better."
"1. If a reputable author submits an
article in a neutral clear writing style, fre of
passive voice constructions, why should a
copy editor attempt to improve such
an article? In my recent experience, not only
was the style comprised by the copy
editor, factual accuracy was also compromised
in certain instances.
2. If LMJ wants a MS Word disk submitted (or
an email version transmitted) in
additions to a double-spaced hard copy, that
should be clearly stated in the
guidelines for authors.
3. Issues with CDs should have much better
coordination at LMJ regarding timely
requests for license agreements, actual
titles and contents of the CD, etc."